Archive for December, 2009

You will find a babe wrapped in swaddling clothes

Sunday, December 27th, 2009

180px-Ambrogio_Lorenzetti_021I’ve been a bit under the weather.   Yes,  good ol’ Sinusitis, its nearly annual visit, late this year.   So it’s with more than a little Christmastide happiness that I find myself up to ambling around with little or no more coughing and wheezing.   The inside-the-head-and-behind-the-eyes pressure is nicely tolerable, and the fatigue-that-tires-before-noon almost gone.  Why I had to get woozy, somewhat ill, and out of sorts during the last of Advent and the beginnings of Christmastide, I have no idea.  But during these past days the Lord has given me a least two small insights that have settled themselves into my Christmastide.  In this posting I’ll tell you about the first.

When reading Luke’s story about the birth of Jesus on Christmas Day, I paused over this verse from chapter two:  “And this will be a sign for you:  you will find a babe wrapped in swaddling cloths and lying in a manger.”   After reading that verse, I went no further;  stopping at verse twelve so that it became my lectio for the day.  I repeated it quietly to myself many times.  As the verse burrowed itself down into my thinking, I became aware that I was having some trouble imagining “swaddling clothes,” mentioned twice in the story.   Luke says that immediately after Jesus was born, Mary “wrapped him in swaddling cloths.”  What were and are swaddling cloths?  Where did they come from?  How did Joseph and Mary come by them?  Did the expectant parents  remember to pack some “swaddling cloths” in their baggage and bring them along on their journey south?  Or later did Joseph tear some cloth from off his outer garment so that Mary would have something to wrap up and bind her freshly washed baby in a tight sort of blanket?  Or did they manage to buy some swaddling clothes along the way?  I thought about the practice of Native American Indians and their practice of wrapping up a baby for its papoose.   Did Mary, having seen others mothers do something like that, wrap up her baby like that?  I began to imagine so.  It was then that I remembered that recently in WalMart, somewhere in the diapers section (while trying to find myself a pair of slippers last month!), I had actually seen packages of “Swaddlers” for sale.  Such a  Pampers product was new to me!  

Then too, I remembered something else, something I’d long wondered about.  I remembered another kind of “swaddling” clothes that Jesus wore much later in his life:  a loin cloth for his crucifixion and the linens with which he was wrapped for his burial.  About the first, I’m not so sure.  Somewhere I’ve read that criminals strung up for crucifixion were generally hung up and nailed down naked, all the more to wrap them in shame and mark them as unworthy of any dignity.  My reading had given me the impression that the loin clothes Jesus wears in our churchly paintings are actually “fig-leaves”  the Church finds necessarily appropriate when depicting the horror of our Lord’s crucifixion.  I’m not entirely sure about that.  But I am sure that after his death, Jesus was again wrapped in “swaddling cloths,” this time designated as “a linen shroud” provided by Joseph of Arimathea.   When the tomb became what many thought would be Jesus final resting place, his eternal manger, he was once again wrapped up and bound in a “swaddling cloth.”

From years of reading Luke, I am convinced that he is, as he tells us in chapter one, a very careful writer, carefully placing highly significant details into his story that are designed to give us pause concerning the implications of what we are reading, seeing, imagining.   Before Luke began writing his story, he knew, of course, the whole of it, from its beginning to its “ending.”   He knew that Jesus would be found in “swaddling,” that is, in “binding” cloth after he was taken down from the cross and carried on a stretcher to his tomb.  He knew that from his birth until Good Friday, Jesus was bound and “swaddled” to die.  And so I wonder if, by including this littlest detail—that Mary wrapped him in swaddling clothes—Luke is not only giving the shepherds a sign, but he is also giving us who read his story a sign as well.  Is it possible that his mention of Mary’s wrapping him in a “swaddling cloth” is nothing less than a gentle footnote, a small reminder that this just-born baby will again wear swaddling cloths?  As in the beginning, so in the ending.   This child is to die for the redemption of the world.

Such a person never belittles anyone

Wednesday, December 16th, 2009

maximus_myroThe person who has come to know the weakness of human nature has gained experience of divine power.  Such a person never belittles anyone . . . . He knows that God is like a good and loving physician who heals with individual treatment each of those who are trying to make progress.

St. Maximos the Confessor (seventh century)

Spiritual Subtraction

Wednesday, December 16th, 2009

shovelingIn The Silence of Unknowing: The Key to the Spiritual Life (Triumph, Missouri: Liquori, 1989), Terence Grant clarifies what it means to imitate Christ:

The German mystic Meister Eckhart taught that spirituality is a matter of subtraction, not addition.   True holiness, true emulation of holy people, involves our dropping the need to be somebody greater than we are . . . .  What about Saint Paul’s instruction that we imitate him as he imitates Christ?   How are we to ‘imitate Christ’?   I think that Paul gives us the answer to this question in what is perhaps his most powerful description of Christ: 

Let the same mind be in you that was in Christ Jesus,
who, though he was in the form of God,
did not regard equality with God
as something to be exploited, but emptied himself
taking the form of a slave,
being born in human likeness.  
(Phillipians 2:5-8; emphasis added).
 
Jesus didn’t try to become anybody important.  In fact, he relinquished any such claim.  He emptied himself.  We imitate Jesus by our emptying of self, not by adding on ideals and standards, nor by trying to copy the lives of great people.  To follow Christ is to abandon our desire to become.”  (20-21)

In directing us to Meister Eckhart’s “matter of substraction,” Grant reminds us that we who wish to imitate Christ, must work constantly and continually at a chipping away of pride.   To become humble, to practice humility takes time and patience, a slow chipping away at pride until it is gone.  

Several friends have recently been discussing this “matter of subtraction” among themselves.  “We are a mountain of pride,” says one, “and we must dig with the shovel of humility, and remove our pride slowly. As we reduce (more…)

“Immensity Cloistered in Thy Dear Womb:” Venerating the Mother of God, Worshipping the Son of God

Monday, December 14th, 2009

As often noted here, each  Monday I receive an essay from Daniel B. Clendenin; it’s usally a reflection, published at Journey with Jesus, on one of the readings appointed for the upcoming Sunday.  Today I’m taking liberty, not only of providing a link to Clendenin’s essay, but of actuality providing the essay in its entirety.  I’m doing this for two reasons.  First, yesterday in our Scripture class at St. John Lutheran Church, we spent an hour discussing the first chapter of Luke’s Gospel from which includes the Gospel reading for the Fourth Sunday in Advent, December 27.   And second, during that Scripture class, we talked about our Lutheran understanding of the Blessed Virgin Mary’s role in our salvation.   Luther  said Mary is “the highest woman,” that “we can never honour her enough,” that “the veneration of Mary is inscribed in the very depths of the human heart, ” and that Christians should “wish that everyone know and respect her”.   The Lutheran Confessions, and many Lutherans today bear witness to the high esteem  they give to the Blessed  Mother of God.   Clendenin in this essay tells us why. 

As we are now in the final weeks of Advent, this reflective essay is well worth reading.  I hope you find it worth your time.  Surely the Blessed Virgin Mary, “in the fulness of time,” as St. Paul says, found it worth her time to say “Yes” to God so that we might know the Lord of all, Jesus Christ.   Here is the essay:

For Sunday December 20, 2009
Fourth Sunday in Advent
Lectionary Readings (Revised Common Lectionary, Year C)
Micah 5:2–5a
Luke 1:46b–55 or Psalm 80:1–7
Hebrews 10:5–10
Luke 1:39–45 (46–55)

           When I was in Oxford several years ago, every evening I left my study carrel and walked down Woodstock Road to the city center and attended the Evensong services at Magdalen College. I loved so many things about those thirty minutes of worship — the peace and quiet, the architecture, the history (Magdalen College was founded in 1448), the smell of the candles that lit the early darkness of October, the boys choir in robes, and the formal liturgy.

Maori_Madonna_and_Child_sm           One part of Evensong caught me off guard; every single night we sang Mary’s “Magnificat” (Luke’s Gospel for this week). Why did the daily liturgy assign her such prominence? Why was Mary so central to the daily Christian confession?

           In the small Presbyterian church where I grew up, every Sunday we recited the Apostles Creed that Jesus was “born of the Virgin Mary.” Practically speaking, Mary played no role at all in my Christian identity. Later I learned that Protestants question dogmas about Mary that were codified quite recently and that do not enjoy clear Biblical support, like her perpetual virginity, her freedom from actual and original sin (Immaculate Conception, 1854), and the idea that she did not die but was taken directly to heaven (Bodily Assumption, 1950).

           We Protestants also get agitated about exalted language that sounds like Mary is a co-redeemer of humanity. And finally, in popular devotion the cult of Mary can drift into excess and superstition. For these reasons, Protestants emphasize a distinction that both Catholic and Orthodox believers acknowledge, that Christians honor or venerate (duleia) Mary as the Mother of God, but we don’t worship her (latreia), which worship is due to God alone.

           Nevertheless, you might argue that no woman has influenced western history and culture more than Mary. Her “Magnificat” in Luke 1:46–55 takes its name from the first word of the Latin text:

My soul glorifies the Lord
   and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior,
for he has been mindful
   of the humble state of his servant.
From now on all generations will call me blessed,
   for the Mighty One has done great things for me—
holy is his name.
   His mercy extends to those who fear him,
from generation to generation.
   He has performed mighty deeds with his arm;
he has scattered those who are proud in their inmost thoughts.
   He has brought down rulers from their thrones
but has lifted up the humble.
   He has filled the hungry with good things
but has sent the rich away empty.
   He has helped his servant Israel,
remembering to be merciful
   to Abraham and his descendants forever,
even as he said to our fathers.

Despite Protestant reservations, Mary remains cenral to our Christian confession for four important reasons.

Ron_Garvais_Madonna_with_Child_sm           Mary was a woman of exemplary faith. She was a peasant girl from a working class neighborhood of carpenters in Nazareth, a village so insignificant that it’s not mentioned in the Old Testament, in the historian Josephus (c. 37–100), or in the Jewish Talmud. “Can anything good come from Nazareth?” asked Nathanael (John 1:46). Her angelic encounter took place in an unknown, ordinary house, not the temple. When the angel Gabriel foretold the birth of her son Jesus, Mary responded in words of faith that have echoed through the centuries: “I am the Lord’s servant, may it be to me as you have said.” Her bold belief startled her pregnant cousin Elizabeth, who exclaimed “in a loud voice: Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the child you will bear! Blessed is she who has believed that what the Lord has said to her will be accomplished!” (Luke 1:38, 42, 45).

           Catholics remind us of another “Marian” truth that’s easy to overlook but nevertheless stupendous. In some mysterious way the incarnation resulted not only from the work of God the Father but also from the will of the Mother Mary. Numerous church fathers acknowledged Mary’s active cooperation in the history of salvation. According to Thomas Aquinas (Summa, III:30), human redemption depended upon the consent of the pregnant teenager Mary. She didn’t ask to bear the Son of God, nor was she compelled to do so. She might have said no, or like Zechariah responded to Gabriel’s staggering annunciation in disbelief. But she didn’t shrink from God’s call on her life, and instead enriched all humanity by her willing participation and obedient submission.

Ronald_Jones_Madonna_and_Child_sm           Mary was also a woman of prophetic pronouncement. Her “Magnificat” moves from the deeply personal to the explicitly political. God, Mary proclaims, “has been mindful of the humble state of His servant. . . the Mighty One has done great things for me.”  This peasant girl who a few months later would bear the Son of God then praises God the Mighty One because He has “brought down rulers from their thrones but has lifted up the humble. He has filled the hungry with good things but has sent the rich away empty” (Luke 1:48–49, 52–53). I wonder what Herod or Tiberius thought when they heard her words. The incarnation of the Son of God, Mary announced, meant the inversion of conventional wisdom. Dethroning political power, plundering rich people, and redistributing food supplies signaled a new age and order.

           Finally, Eastern Orthodox believers emphasize that because the son of Mary was the Son of God, God made flesh, we honor her with the technical term theotokos (“bearer of God”). In his poem The Annunciation John Donne thus marvels:

Salvation to all that will is nigh;
That All, which always is all everywhere,
Which cannot sin, and yet all sins must bear,
Which cannot die, yet cannot choose but die,
Lo, faithful virgin, yields Himself to lie
In prison, in thy womb; and though He there
Can take no sin, nor thou give, yet He will wear,
Taken from thence, flesh, which death’s force may try.
Ere by the spheres time was created, thou
Wast in His mind, who is thy Son and Brother;
Whom thou conceivst, conceived; yea thou art now
Thy Maker’s maker, and thy Father’s mother;
Thou hast light in dark, and shutst in little room,
Immensity cloistered in thy dear womb.

This term theotokos bestowed upon Mary by church fathers since the third century acknowledges her special role in redemption; she is nothing less than the “Mother of God.” When the term gained official status at the third ecumenical council of Ephesus in 431, the intent was to emphasize the full divinity of the son more than the privileged status of his mother. Mary did not give birth to a mere man (christotokos), as the Nestorians taught; she bore a child who was fully divine.

 Larry_Scully_Madonna_And_Child_Soweto_sm           If you wonder why Catholics and the Orthodox refer to Mary as the “Blessed Virgin,” consider the Gospel for this week: “Blessed are you among women,” Elizabeth said. “From now on all generations shall call me blessed,” Mary acknowledged. Veneration of the Mother of God leads to exaltation of the Son of God, which is precisely the message of Christmas: “My soul glorifies the Lord and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior.”

For further reflection

* What has been your experience of Mary?
*
With which of the four aspects of Mary above do you most fully resonate?
*
What other subversions of cultural conventions might follow those of food, money, and political power because of the incarnation?
*
Listen to Bach’s rendition of the “Magnificat.”
*
Jaroslav Pelikan, Mary Through the Centuries (2004); Tim Perry, Mary for Evangelicals (2006); Scott McKnight, The Real Mary; Why Evangelical Christians Can Embrace the Mother of God (2006).

The Day Alone: Solitude and Silence (continued)

Sunday, December 13th, 2009

Bonhoeffer_3Dietrich Bonhoeffer wrote Life Together for his “illegal” and clandestine seminary hidden in the Bavarian Forest from the Nazi regime.   This posting is a continuation of a series begun several days ago; the text is from Chapter Three, “The Day Alone.”

There is an indifferent, or even negative, attitude toward silence which sees in it a disparagement of God’s revelation in the Word.  This is the view which misinterprets silence as a ceremonial gesture, as a mystical desire to get beyond the Word.  This is to miss the essential relationship of silence to the Word.  Silence is the simple stillness of the individual under the Word of God.  We are silent before hearing the Word because our thoughts are already directed to the Word, as a child is quiet when he enters his father’s room.  We are silent after hearing the Word because the Word is still speaking and dwelling within us.  We are silent at the beginning of the day because God should have the first word, and we are silent before going to sleep because the last word also belongs to God.  We keep silence solely for the sake of the Word, and therefore not in order to show disrregard for the Word but rather to honor and receive it. (79)

With these words Bonhoeffer shares with us his conviction that the Word of God requires our utmost attention, so much so that we might well frame the Word of God with silence:  silence before hearing so that we listen all the better, and silence after the hearing so that we may allow the Word of God to fall deeply within our thinking and hearts.   The observance of these silence is not to be  ”a cermonial gesture,”  even though it may become among us a liturgical practice when, for example, the reader may pause after the reading of a first lesson before he or she moves forward to the reading or another, perhaps a psalm spoken antiphonally by reader and congregation.  One pastor I know goes so far as to sit down for a full two or three minutes after he has finished his sermon, signaling to the congregation that he will sit with them as together they “ponder” the Word of God which they have heard.   Such silence does much to accentuate the importance of genuinely hearing the Word of God.   “Let him who has an ear, hear!” says Jesus.

The Day Alone: Solitude and Silence (continued)

Saturday, December 12th, 2009

BPK 30.013.695Silence does not mean dumbness, as speech does not mean chatter.   Dumbness doese not create solitude and chattr does not create fellowship.  “Silence is the excess, the inebriation, the victim of speech.  But dumbness is unholy, like a thing only maimed, not cleanly sacrificed . . . Zacharias was speechless, instead of being silent.  Had he accepted the revelation, he may perhaps have come out of the temple not dumb but silent” (Ernest Hello).  The speech, the Word which estabishes and binds together the fellowship, is accompanied by silence.  “There is a time to keep silence, and a time to speak” (Eccles. 3:7).  As there are definite hours in the Christian’s day for the Word, particularly the time of common worship and prayer, so the day also needs definite times of silence, silence under the Word and silence that comes out of the Word.  These will be especially the times before and after hearing the Word.  The Word comes ot to the chatterer but to him who holds the tongue.  The stillness of the temple is the sign of the holy presence of God in His Word. (Life Together, 78-79).

Bonhoeffer’s writing here is pregnant with insight.   First, he makes the crucial distinction between silence and simply not talking.   The latter, either the physical inability to talk or merely “clamming up,” is not true silence.  Genuine silence comes out of hearing the Word and then quietly listening with the heart.  Second, Bonhoeffer observes that “the Word comes not to the chatterer but to him who hold his tongue..”   When we talk too much, are too yakkedly, and continually fill other’s ears with constant trivia (especially when in the temple, that is, the parish church–and by extension in chatrooms, listservs, telephone conversations, and at coffee tables), we make our chatter a barrier keeping us away from the Word, who is Christ.  I don’t know about you, but I have been to services within a church where not of ounce of silence was presented either before and after the coming of the Word; even the prayers demands some background music, an organ tickling away at some melody reminiscent of what I hear in department stores.  It’s a sure sign that many Christians are uncomfortable with silence.  “The stillness of the temple is the sign of the holy presence of God in His Word,” says Bonhoeffer.  In contrast to the constant noise in many services of worship today, how good it is, for example, to participate in a contemplative Eucharist wherein quiet sitting, a time for reflection, is a gift given to us after Scripture readings, after the sermon, and during prayers.   Surely the churches need to encourage and make room for more silence in worship.  And surely we too need to make more room for silence in our personal lives.

The 41st anniversary of the death of Thomas Merton,

Thursday, December 10th, 2009

mertonThis morning from Merton-L (a listserv dedicated to conversations concerning Thomas Merton), I received from Jim Forest the following notice , and trusting it’s all right to do so, wish to share it with you.   Reminding us that today is the 41st anniversary of the death of Thomas Merton, Jim provides an extended quotation from the last few pages of the revised edition of his Living With Wisdom: A Life of Thomas Merton:
 
* * *

In the decades since his death, far from fading from memory,
Thomas Merton seems to have influenced even more people than he
did while he was alive.

Not only do a great many of his books remain in print, but many
new, posthumous collections have been published. These include
his complete journals (seven volumes, plus an additional volume,
The Intimate Merton, with journal highlights) and five substantial
collections of letters, along with numerous exchanges of letters
giving both side of the correspondence — Bob Lax, Jean Leclercq,
James Laughlin, Czeslaw Milosz, Rosemary Ruether and others.
Various series of conferences presented to young monks in his
charge, originally circulated only in mimeographed form, are now
available as books. What might please him most was the recent
publication of two still-timely books that had once been banned by
his Abbot General: Peace in the Post-Christian Era and Cold War
Letters. Also now available is a book he wrote and rewrote many
times, but never quite finished: The Inner Experience. (Yet even
now not everything he wrote for publication has appeared in print,
including Art and Worship.)

Merton bibliographer Patricia Burton tells me that, since 1948, the
average number of Merton editions, re-issues, and new publications
per annum worldwide had been fifteen.

A good many of Merton’s books are available not only in English
but in twenty-nine other languages, including Dutch, French,
German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Polish, Portuguese, Russian,
Spanish and Swedish.

Besides his writings, many of Merton’s works of art and
photographs have also become much better known. The Thomas
Merton Center has created a collection of Merton’s photos that has
traveled as far from Louisville as Avila, Spain, and Vienna, Austria.

Apart from Merton’s own books, which in our house fill more than
three shelves, there are many books by other authors that are either
about Merton or refer to him in a substantial way. In our case, with a
collection far from complete, these currently take up another two
shelves.

(more…)

The Day Alone: Solitude and Silence (continued)

Wednesday, December 9th, 2009

contemplative_outreachToday I’m posting a third quotation from Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s Life Together, Chapter Three, “The Day Alone.”   Perhaps a little background about this posting might prove helpful.   Life Together is considered a classic, well worth serious reading, among those who read about Christian spirituality.  I have read it many times.   During the past few weeks, I decided to read it once  more very slowly as a “sacred text,”  pages made exceptionally valuable by way of lectio divina.     This way of reading requires I slow down so that I read only a paragraph or two at most, concentrating on one  idea, perhaps one image, perhaps one word, so that during the day I can return to the idea, image, word, or phrase many times during the day.  By reading slowly and letting the Holy Spirit impress me something foregrounded—a word, image, phrase, idea—I ‘m given the privilege of “chewing” (like a cow, some say)  over and over a single, sacred, and sacramental ”something” so that I can turn it over, sense its implications, digest it, taste it, and so take a good deep look at its meaning for my life. 

Already I done such reading with the earlier two chapters in Life Together: Chapter I, Community; Chapter II, “The Day with Others.”   At the end of last week I began reading and sharing with you Chapter III, “The Day Alone.”   Today I’m reading the following two paragraphs and will be chewing the following words in my cud throughout the day.  Perhaps you’d like to chew with me.

Along with the day of the Christian family fellowship together there goes the lonely day of the individual.  This is as it should  be.  The day together will be unfruitful without the day alone, both for the fellowship and for the individual.

The mark of solitude is silence, as speech is the mark of community.  Silence and speech have the same inner correspondence and difference as do solitude and community.  One does not exist without the other.  Right speech comes out of silence, and right silence comes out of speech.  (78)

Bonhoeffer’s insight into the relationship between solitude and community is an exceptionally good one.   As I reflect on its application in my life, I have come to realize that I simply cannot live a balanced and fully spiritual life in Christ without entering silence and community in almost equal proportions.  It’s for this reason that I try hard to wake up early, often around 4:30 or 5:00, in order to sit outside (if possible) and enter contemplative prayer for an extended period of time.  And in the evening, whenever possible (sometimes it  just isn’t), I again set aside a chair for myself in an empty room and, sitting  comfortably and closing my eyes, allow myself to reduce all anxieties, worries, and thoughts about myself so that I may be fully in the presence of the Most Holy Other, the Beloved.  Practicing Centering  Prayer in the morning and evening, twice daily, is now for me as necessary as breathing and eating, sleeping and walking, reading and writing, working and resting.  I pray that it may be so for you too.

The Day Alone: Solitude and Silence (continued)

Monday, December 7th, 2009

communityWe recognize, then, that only as we are within the fellowship can we be alone, and only he that is along can live in the followship.  Only in the fellowship do we learn to be rightly alone and only in aloneness do we learn to live rightly in the fellowship.  It is not as tough the one preceded the other; both begin at the same time, namely, with the call of Jesus Christ.

Each by itself has profound pitfalls and perils.  One who wants fellowship without solitude plunges into the void of words and feelings, and one who seeks solitude without fellowship perishes in the abyss of vanity, self-infatuation, and despair.

Let him who cannot be alone beware of community.  Let him who is not in community beware of being alone.

–Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Life Together, Chapter Three, “The Day Alone” (New York: HarperCollins), 77-78.

An Essay for The Third Sunday in Advent

Monday, December 7th, 2009

In Advent we are looking  for Jesus’ coming to us.  What does Jesus mean when he says, “For judgment I came into the world?”  This is the question Dan B. Clendenin asks at the end of his essay, “From Political Analysis to Moral Civil_War_Congo_smAccountability: Ancient Poetry and Modern ‘Eliminationism’.”   Based on the Old Testament reading for next Sunday, Zephaniah 3:14-20,” Clendenin’s essays is a horror story in which we are implicated.   Here is the beginning of the essay:

Last month I read Worse Than War: Genocide, Eliminationism, and the Ongoing Assault on Humanity by Daniel Goldhagen.   Read the essay here.